I was a Boy Scout.
Oct. 20th, 2010 09:44 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I spent some of the best times of my youth as a Boy Scout. But, these days, I'm rather ashamed to admit it, due to some of the organization's policies. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, I could understand the narrow-mindedness and phobia - the Boy Scouts of America wasn't notably different than the rest of the country. But by now, they should know better.
You don't need to be heterosexual or religious to be a good person, responsible adult, or positive role-model for young boys. The BSA would do better to advance it's thinking into the 21st century.
Boy Scouts tell gay leader to take a hike
You don't need to be heterosexual or religious to be a good person, responsible adult, or positive role-model for young boys. The BSA would do better to advance it's thinking into the 21st century.
Boy Scouts tell gay leader to take a hike
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 01:50 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, the REAL problem is the Mormons; Scouting is the official youth program for the LDS chuch and without their money, BSA would have withered away back in the early 80s -- it means that the church has a fair amount of control over BSA policy at the moment. (For example, the BSA uniform shorts were changed to be longer so as to hide the Garment).
it's a sad thing.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 02:00 pm (UTC)But I don't care. I will not support Boy Scouts until they stop this policy.
Umbran: perhaps you should tell them how you feel.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 02:15 pm (UTC)I don't mind making the shorts a little longer for the sake of some of the boys, any more than I'd mind scheduling a fund raising pancake breakfast so Jewish members of the troop could take part. I'm all for flexing a bit for the beliefs of others. But these policies are a bit much.
Unfortunately, there's a chicken and egg issue here - I, for example, would not donate money to the national organization at this point, as I cannot condone their policies. But, the situation will change slowly, or not at all, until a bunch of folks like me do start donating to the national organization and insisting that the policies must change.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 03:57 pm (UTC)I see no reason to be embarrassed about having been a member of a group because of what a few retards do (like, oh, say the SCA and that abuse suit...). BSA has a lot of good going for it - so does the SCA. BSA has some mighty nasty warts, so does the SCA.
BSA does know they should not have done this, and the few National employees I've spoken too think it'll eventually be reversed. Eventually.
Our local troop, and most of the other local troops (likely not Littleton's LDS troop) accept gay leaders - our Council wouldn't *quite* put it *all* the way in writing, they'll be shut down by National if they do. Our Institutional Head is gay as Christmas, and their ain't anyone who doesn't know it. A nearby town has a gay Scoutmaster; they seem to do fine.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 03:08 pm (UTC)I don't know what I would do if I had a son.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-20 04:08 pm (UTC)