ursangnome: (whut)
ursangnome ([personal profile] ursangnome) wrote2010-02-24 04:40 pm
Entry tags:

Nigh-epiphany from a new term

I learned a new term today that has helped to encapsulate a number of things I had been thinking about modern governance. The term is, "rational ignorance".

People (worldwide, not just in the USA) generally don't know a whole lot about the issues of their day. Honestly, the scope and depth of their understanding is small. The simple reason for this is the fact that gaining full understanding of even one issue is a huge amount of work. A rational person looks at the amount of work it takes to gain understanding, and the amount of good they can gain or do with that understanding. If the good they can do is worth less than the work required - it is entirely rational to remain ignorant!

However, it is still rational to vote, as the effort required there is small, the payoff can be tiny but still worth the effort.

Thus - as a broad generalization, it is rational for people to vote in a state of ignorance of the issues!

What a revolting development that is...

[identity profile] rickvs.livejournal.com 2010-02-25 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. I think the idea is -- by the same token I pay car mechanics to learn more about their specialty than I do -- we're supposed to be able to trust our elected officials to find out more about a given political situation than we have time for, and vote the way we'd vote if we had time to learn all the details.

The problem appears to be that my elected officials don't seem to believe they are as much in the business of gathering and filtering information as I'd prefer.

[identity profile] vettecat.livejournal.com 2010-03-02 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting concept...